Comment by JodieBenitez
5 days ago
> audio interface, which do not have as much jitter these days
But it's not about audio jitter.
Anyway, like I said, too much speculation in this thread.
5 days ago
> audio interface, which do not have as much jitter these days
But it's not about audio jitter.
Anyway, like I said, too much speculation in this thread.
It’s about MIDI jitter, and if the MIDI clock is locked to the audio clock, its going to be pretty darn good.
That's a big "if". And then there is the jitter induced by the gear receiving the clock. Many drum machines are bad there. See https://innerclocksystems.com/litmus/
It’s really not a big if, it’s currently an actual reality of modern audio interface/DAW configurations. Very few modern audio interfaces do not have MID clock very tightly bound to their audio clock, which is the master clock with far greater accuracy, anyway.
Yes, MIDI jitter can be compounded on the receiving end - but having a very tightly bound MIDI clock to the audio clock can negate a lot of those issues upstream in the first place, and that is precisely why you get a good audio interface that does this anyway.
(Disclaimer: have worked in pro audio product development for decades, have written drivers for exactly this use-case, and I have personally been in the trenches to fight the myths about Audio and MIDI jitter as a developer for a long time now..)