← Back to context Comment by drumhead 2 months ago Invading and kidnapping the leader of a sovreign nation sounds rather illegal to me. 4 comments drumhead Reply tbrownaw 2 months ago Is it really illegal is nobody has the power to apply that designation? jacquesm 2 months ago Absolutely. I declare it so. adventured 2 months ago There's no such thing as a sovereign dictatorship, that's a contradiction in terms. p10jkle 2 months ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign> The roles of a sovereign vary from monarch, ruler or head of state to head of municipal government or head of a chivalric order. As a result, the word sovereignty has more recently also come to mean independence or autonomy.
tbrownaw 2 months ago Is it really illegal is nobody has the power to apply that designation? jacquesm 2 months ago Absolutely. I declare it so.
adventured 2 months ago There's no such thing as a sovereign dictatorship, that's a contradiction in terms. p10jkle 2 months ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign> The roles of a sovereign vary from monarch, ruler or head of state to head of municipal government or head of a chivalric order. As a result, the word sovereignty has more recently also come to mean independence or autonomy.
p10jkle 2 months ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign> The roles of a sovereign vary from monarch, ruler or head of state to head of municipal government or head of a chivalric order. As a result, the word sovereignty has more recently also come to mean independence or autonomy.
Is it really illegal is nobody has the power to apply that designation?
Absolutely. I declare it so.
There's no such thing as a sovereign dictatorship, that's a contradiction in terms.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign
> The roles of a sovereign vary from monarch, ruler or head of state to head of municipal government or head of a chivalric order. As a result, the word sovereignty has more recently also come to mean independence or autonomy.