← Back to context Comment by drumhead 6 days ago Invading and kidnapping the leader of a sovreign nation sounds rather illegal to me. 4 comments drumhead Reply tbrownaw 6 days ago Is it really illegal is nobody has the power to apply that designation? jacquesm 6 days ago Absolutely. I declare it so. adventured 6 days ago There's no such thing as a sovereign dictatorship, that's a contradiction in terms. p10jkle 6 days ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign> The roles of a sovereign vary from monarch, ruler or head of state to head of municipal government or head of a chivalric order. As a result, the word sovereignty has more recently also come to mean independence or autonomy.
tbrownaw 6 days ago Is it really illegal is nobody has the power to apply that designation? jacquesm 6 days ago Absolutely. I declare it so.
adventured 6 days ago There's no such thing as a sovereign dictatorship, that's a contradiction in terms. p10jkle 6 days ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign> The roles of a sovereign vary from monarch, ruler or head of state to head of municipal government or head of a chivalric order. As a result, the word sovereignty has more recently also come to mean independence or autonomy.
p10jkle 6 days ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign> The roles of a sovereign vary from monarch, ruler or head of state to head of municipal government or head of a chivalric order. As a result, the word sovereignty has more recently also come to mean independence or autonomy.
Is it really illegal is nobody has the power to apply that designation?
Absolutely. I declare it so.
There's no such thing as a sovereign dictatorship, that's a contradiction in terms.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign
> The roles of a sovereign vary from monarch, ruler or head of state to head of municipal government or head of a chivalric order. As a result, the word sovereignty has more recently also come to mean independence or autonomy.