Comment by aboardRat4
6 days ago
It surely was a big factor.
When internet finally became popular, hosting a website on your own machine already became infeasible.
6 days ago
It surely was a big factor.
When internet finally became popular, hosting a website on your own machine already became infeasible.
What do you mean by popular? I hosted a site on a home machine in the early teens. If you don't know how to do that with NAT, you should not have a web server under your control exposed to the internet.
The early teens didn’t have huge proliferation of ISPs using CGNATs.
These days ISP can’t get hold of new IPv4 blocks, and increasingly don’t provide public IP addresses to residential routers, not without having to pay extra for that lowly single IPv4 address.
Hosting a website behind a NAT isn’t as trivial as it used to be, and for many it’s now impossible without IPv6.
> Hosting a website behind a NAT isn’t as trivial as it used to be, and for many it’s now impossible without IPv6.
The example I keep coming back to is multiplayer games like Mario Kart, where Nintendo tell you to put the Switch in the DMZ or forward a huge range of ports (1024-65535!) to it [1].
If you’ve got more than one Switch in the household, though, then I guess it sucks to be you.
1: https://www.nintendo.com/en-gb/Support/Troubleshooting/How-t...
4 replies →
>for many it’s now impossible without IPv6.
It's impossible with ipv6 either. ISPs block incoming connections on ipv6 for residential addresses.
1 reply →