← Back to context Comment by WalterBright 2 months ago I suggested an alternative solution to the one proposed by the comment I replied to. 6 comments WalterBright Reply jagged-chisel 2 months ago I don’t understand how “make it tax-deductible” is an alternative to “nationalize healthcare so it’s not tied to employment.” WalterBright 2 months ago Sorry, I don't know how to make it any clearer. jagged-chisel 2 months ago It’s already tax deductible. Just saying “make it tax deductible” doesn’t explain what you mean. 2 replies → zeroonetwothree 2 months ago It would make insurance less tied to employment without nationalizing it.
jagged-chisel 2 months ago I don’t understand how “make it tax-deductible” is an alternative to “nationalize healthcare so it’s not tied to employment.” WalterBright 2 months ago Sorry, I don't know how to make it any clearer. jagged-chisel 2 months ago It’s already tax deductible. Just saying “make it tax deductible” doesn’t explain what you mean. 2 replies → zeroonetwothree 2 months ago It would make insurance less tied to employment without nationalizing it.
WalterBright 2 months ago Sorry, I don't know how to make it any clearer. jagged-chisel 2 months ago It’s already tax deductible. Just saying “make it tax deductible” doesn’t explain what you mean. 2 replies →
jagged-chisel 2 months ago It’s already tax deductible. Just saying “make it tax deductible” doesn’t explain what you mean. 2 replies →
zeroonetwothree 2 months ago It would make insurance less tied to employment without nationalizing it.
I don’t understand how “make it tax-deductible” is an alternative to “nationalize healthcare so it’s not tied to employment.”
Sorry, I don't know how to make it any clearer.
It’s already tax deductible. Just saying “make it tax deductible” doesn’t explain what you mean.
2 replies →
It would make insurance less tied to employment without nationalizing it.