← Back to context Comment by terminalshort 4 days ago I would choose civil war over being ruled by socialist any it's not close. 3 comments terminalshort Reply taveras 4 days ago Would you elaborate on your definitions for “being ruled” and “socialist”?Does that mean you would prefer violent rebellion over a United States president with social liberal public policies?Would you have taken up arms under either of the Roosevelts?Extremism and violence tend to go hand-in-hand. terminalshort 4 days ago Did I say "social democrat" or did I say "socialist"?
taveras 4 days ago Would you elaborate on your definitions for “being ruled” and “socialist”?Does that mean you would prefer violent rebellion over a United States president with social liberal public policies?Would you have taken up arms under either of the Roosevelts?Extremism and violence tend to go hand-in-hand. terminalshort 4 days ago Did I say "social democrat" or did I say "socialist"?
Would you elaborate on your definitions for “being ruled” and “socialist”?
Does that mean you would prefer violent rebellion over a United States president with social liberal public policies?
Would you have taken up arms under either of the Roosevelts?
Extremism and violence tend to go hand-in-hand.
Did I say "social democrat" or did I say "socialist"?