Comment by nutjob2
4 days ago
The US provides a large amount of the military force so it has a lot of influence but you're missing the point: it is a mutual protection agreement. Each country agrees to protect the other against attacks. This would be the case even without the US. It is not under US command since it a cooperative organization that elects its own leader and everything it does is though mutual agreement.
But you didn't answer my question: how is NATO a mobster? Because the US is involved? Even if one accepts your anti-US view in this regard, how does that make the other countries in NATO mobsters? Guilt by association? Other NATO countries have shown to be quite independent from the US in recent history.
You misread my comment: when I referred to mobster I was talking about the US “liberating” other countries and not to NATO.
So this is the response to your question.
Anyhow NATO is still under US great influence so in a way or another is acting as an extension of US.
There is nothing bad in joining a coalition but please don’t tell me NATO is not acting as a branch of US when exercising US influence.
Now go back to the point: US liberated Venezuela, yes for sure and it didn’t do for oil or other political interests and it won’t force it’s interests upon those of Venezuelans nor it will put people in command that are neutral and are not puppets in the hands of the US…come on how can you believe the bullshit of war to export democracy and freedom, how?
I responded to your comment as written, you're adding more to it in this reply or importing earlier of your comments. I still disagree with your characterization of NATO.
The US invasion of Venezuela illegal under both US and international and just plain wrong.
I don't support it and never said I did, go through my comment history and check if you want to.
[dead]