← Back to context Comment by WalterBright 4 days ago Or just have the language initialize it for you! 8 comments WalterBright Reply 1718627440 4 days ago Thanks, I very much don't want that. There are also people (like me) who find the C semantics pretty great. WalterBright 3 days ago > I very much don't want thatWhy? What does it cost you? 1718627440 3 days ago Making something a valid program that shouldn't be. Thus, potentially creating/hiding bugs. I also explicitly invoke UB on all the code paths I do not want to be valid. 5 replies →
1718627440 4 days ago Thanks, I very much don't want that. There are also people (like me) who find the C semantics pretty great. WalterBright 3 days ago > I very much don't want thatWhy? What does it cost you? 1718627440 3 days ago Making something a valid program that shouldn't be. Thus, potentially creating/hiding bugs. I also explicitly invoke UB on all the code paths I do not want to be valid. 5 replies →
WalterBright 3 days ago > I very much don't want thatWhy? What does it cost you? 1718627440 3 days ago Making something a valid program that shouldn't be. Thus, potentially creating/hiding bugs. I also explicitly invoke UB on all the code paths I do not want to be valid. 5 replies →
1718627440 3 days ago Making something a valid program that shouldn't be. Thus, potentially creating/hiding bugs. I also explicitly invoke UB on all the code paths I do not want to be valid. 5 replies →
Thanks, I very much don't want that. There are also people (like me) who find the C semantics pretty great.
> I very much don't want that
Why? What does it cost you?
Making something a valid program that shouldn't be. Thus, potentially creating/hiding bugs. I also explicitly invoke UB on all the code paths I do not want to be valid.
5 replies →