Comment by croemer
3 days ago
Don't worry, it's an LLM that wrote it based on the patterns in the text, e.g. "Starting a new project once felt insurmountable. Now, it feels realistic again."
3 days ago
Don't worry, it's an LLM that wrote it based on the patterns in the text, e.g. "Starting a new project once felt insurmountable. Now, it feels realistic again."
That is a normal, run of the mill sentence.
Yes, for an LLM. The good thing about LLMs is that they can infer patterns. The bad thing about LLMs is that they infer patterns. The patterns change a bit over time, but the overuse of certain language patterns remains a constant.
One could argue that some humans write that way, but ultimately it does not matter if the text was generated by an LLM, reworded by a human in a semi-closed loop or organically produced by human. The patterns indicate that the text is just a regurgitation of buzzwords and it's even worse if an LLM-like text was produced organically.
I can't prove it of course but I stand by it.
Claiming that use of more complicated words and sentences is evidence of LLM use is just paranoia. Plenty of folk write like OP does, myself included.