← Back to context

Comment by furyofantares

1 month ago

Definitely, although maybe it's ok here. I'm not sure. The opening paragraph doesn't feel like it. The rest could be condensed to 1 or 2 paragraphs and it would better communicate the idea.

It's not too bad because it's not too long, but I think it's worse than if the human had just written a second part to the post about the length of the first part.

Notice there's all these needless sections that have the LLM-form.

> What "Taking the Position" Actually Looks Like

> Why Sustained Performance Is What Counts

> The Responsibility-First Mindset

And each has this opening paragraph setup then a one sentence paragraph contradicting or reinforcing it, which is simultaneously punchy and pure fluff.

> I couldn't have been happier.

> And I mean sustained.

> But that's backward.

I can't really tell how much the author cares about any given bit of text beyond the starting paragraph because it's all expressed with too many words that don't say anything, but just evoke the marketing/linkedin-speak, giving everything too much weight.

good observations of AIGC form here

Continually sad to see each day that the vast majority of users cannot classify