Comment by mccoyb
17 days ago
I think this read is generous:
> something like gas town is clearly not attempting to be a production grade tool.
Compare to the first two sentences:
> Gas Town is a new take on the IDE for 2026. Gas Town helps you with the tedium of running lots of Claude Code instances. Stuff gets lost, it’s hard to track who’s doing what, etc. Gas Town helps with all that yak shaving, and lets you focus on what your Claude Codes are working on.
Compared to your read, my read is confused: is it or is it not intending to be a useful tool (we can debate "production" quality, here I'm just thinking something I'd actually use meaningfully -- like Claude Code)?
I think the author wants us to take this post seriously, so I'm taking it seriously, and my critique in the original post was a serious reaction.
The blog post says, many times, not to use Gastown. It makes fun of the tool's inconsistent branding and describes a lot of jankiness.
This tool is dangerous, largely untested, and yet may be of interest if you are already doing similar things in production.