Comment by kllrnohj
2 days ago
> Why any technical person would want a PC that explicitly can't run Linux I'll never know.
Huh? https://www.phoronix.com/review/snapdragon-x1e-september
2 days ago
> Why any technical person would want a PC that explicitly can't run Linux I'll never know.
Huh? https://www.phoronix.com/review/snapdragon-x1e-september
More recent revisit: https://www.phoronix.com/review/snapdragon-x-elite-linux-eoy...
TL;DR: It runs, but not well, and performance has regressed since the last published benchmark.
Tuxedo is a german company relabling Clevo Laptops so far, which work out-of-the-box pretty good (I might say perfect in some cases) on Linux. They have done ZILCH, NADA, absolute nothing for Linux, besides promoting it as a brand. So now they took a snapdragon laptop, installed linux and are disappointed by the performance....Great test, tremendous work! Asahi Linux showed if you put in the work you can have awesome performance.
Yes but having to reverse engineer an entire platform from scratch is a big ask, and even with asahi it's taken many years and isn't up to snuff. Not to say anything of the team, they're truly miracle workers considering what they've been given to work with.
But it's been the same story with ARM on windows now for at least a decade. The manufacturers just... do not give a single fuck. ARM is not comparable to x86 and will never be if ARM manufacturers continue to sabotage their own platform. It's not just Linux, either, these things are barely supported on Windows, run a fraction of the software, and don't run for very long. Ask anyone burned by ARM on windows attempts 1-100.
> if you put in the work you can have awesome performance.
Then why would I pay money for a Qualcomm device just for more suffering? Unless I personally like tinkering or I am contributing to an open source project specifically for this, there is no way I would purchase a Qualcomm PC.
Which is what the original comment is about.
3 replies →