← Back to context Comment by Gathering6678 2 months ago I suppose it would be trivial to simply block or severely throttle high-volume SMTP traffic? 4 comments Gathering6678 Reply userbinator 2 months ago Additionally, this will make it look like you're a spammer. stackskipton 2 months ago You could block SMTP on almost all end user networks with no one noticing. 99.9+% of email client submission is HTTPS. bauruine 2 months ago I doubt it's that much but with the same logic you could also ban HN, SSH and basically any protocol thats not https "with no one noticing" because 99.9+% doesnt use it. ranger_danger 2 months ago Source:
stackskipton 2 months ago You could block SMTP on almost all end user networks with no one noticing. 99.9+% of email client submission is HTTPS. bauruine 2 months ago I doubt it's that much but with the same logic you could also ban HN, SSH and basically any protocol thats not https "with no one noticing" because 99.9+% doesnt use it. ranger_danger 2 months ago Source:
bauruine 2 months ago I doubt it's that much but with the same logic you could also ban HN, SSH and basically any protocol thats not https "with no one noticing" because 99.9+% doesnt use it.
Additionally, this will make it look like you're a spammer.
You could block SMTP on almost all end user networks with no one noticing. 99.9+% of email client submission is HTTPS.
I doubt it's that much but with the same logic you could also ban HN, SSH and basically any protocol thats not https "with no one noticing" because 99.9+% doesnt use it.
Source: