← Back to context

Comment by closewith

2 days ago

The age of plausibly buying a legacy is gone, so these vanity projects inspire more cynicism than anything else.

I am not understanding how this is bad. Other than a guy made a bunch of money and is spending it how he wants. Or is that the whole reason?

  • > a guy made a bunch of money

    Through the systemic abuse and exploitation of countless individuals' privacy and autonomy. The context is everything.

  • > Other than a guy made a bunch of money and is spending it how he wants.

    A guy has woken up to the fact that he'll be remembered as a villian and is trying to whitewash his reputation.

    • I don’t know that the vast majority of Americans know who Eric Schmidt is. And unless they find little green men, no one will care about this project, so it won’t affect his (essentially nonexistent) reputation.

      It’s not unlike if you had a blog post about a gardening project in your backyard. Perhaps interesting to gardeners, but approximately no one cares.

      Low effort cynicism.

Well, this is better than what Bezos is using his surplus money for.

  • Bezos is one of the best, though? Blue Origin, the Long Now foundation, and I could go on all day. I don't know of too many other billionaires so willing so spend vast sums on the Heinleinian dreams of their youth.

    • I don't believe it's a net benefit to the world when a single person fundamentally changes entire economies, captures a significant portion of the resource stream and then maybe a some point redirects a portion of of it to their pet projects. Although I strongly support shooting tech bros and politicians into space (one way; even better)!