← Back to context

Comment by diath

2 days ago

> too bad there's such a focus on animal protein/products,

Non-animal protein sources (like soy and beans) have very poor bioavailability.

I've heard this claim repeated a lot, in the case of soy "very poor" just doesn't seem supported by the data and more importantly in a real world setting one particular protein source lacking a specific amino acid doesn't matter as much because it is mostly not consumed in isolation.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11171741/

But non-animal proteins bio-accumulate less harmfull stuff (like lead) and contain more useful minerals. I hate doing the "the truth is in the middle" guy, but here, the correct diet is clearly in the middle, no?

Why does that one particular facet matter the most?

As I understand it diets with modest amounts of animal protein are cheaper, healthier, and ultimately more sustainable for the ecosphere.