← Back to context

Comment by krainboltgreene

3 days ago

[flagged]

No, I have the same question as that other poster. It is not a bad faith question.

There are a lot of problems that would be solved immediately if "we" (i.e. all of humanity, or all of the U.S. or some other country) decided collectively to do something: climate change, nuclear weapons proliferation, war, and so on. But that's effectively wishing for magic -- there is no way to get everyone to collectively agree on something, so unless you explain how to cope with that fact, you haven't actually made any progress.

Given that I personally don't control humanity as a hive mind, what can I do to fix this problem? You haven't proposed an answer to that.

the strong interpretation is that you mean we gotta do something. and it's really not "simply" even because "we" needs to include everyone and whoever is a renegade will get more benefit.

so if "say" is an euphemism for "do" it seems an obvious question what exactly do we "do". that's another reason why it's not "simply". even if everybody was ready to do something as one, if you think everybody just knows what we should do because it's so obvious you'r mistaken.

sure it's asked a bit sarcastic but sarcasm isn't banned right?