← Back to context

Comment by deepsun

3 days ago

Rephrasing my original point -- landlords do add value, but not as much to offset the negatives of locking down the resources.

I disagree, but I am interested in pulling this thread somewhat. What would be alternative? The role will likely exist in some form regardless, but I suppose there are obviously ways to make it less common just by removing of its incentives. That said, I might be tipping my hand a little.

  • Land Value Tax is one way, a very old idea.

    Germany practices basically rent control, so that 60%+ of population rent and consider it stable. That's another way.

    Maybe there are more, I didn't think hard. The basic idea is to prevent formation of an "aristocracy" that holds some limited but necessary (not luxury) resource. Pretty much every revolution happened because of that.

    • But wouldn't this suggest that the solution is really just stopping ( and then keeping ) things from being too excessive?