← Back to context

Comment by bryanrasmussen

3 days ago

>If the actions and beliefs of a group are fundamentally morally repugnant to me,

sure, although if tribal differences are always experienced as fundamentally morally repugnant one might think the moral calibration is screwed a bit too tight.

>I think that it is reasonable to not expect me to be able to find "something positive" in it.

Sure, I do think it is possible that some groups are so morally repugnant that they have absolutely nothing to offer whatsoever. For example that tribe of cave dwelling cannibals in the film The 13th Warrior, man those guys sucked! But the comment seemed more to be about how it is weird that when you find some group does some things that you find morally repugnant then they have nothing they do that can ever be good.

I have lived in places in which I find much of the surrounding culture to have behaviors that I found morally repugnant, or intellectually repugnant for that matter, but even at my most contemptuous of a culture and a people I will at times be forced to admit, honestly, that they have behaviors that can also be considered admirable (in many cultures the repugnant bits are so tightly bound to the admirable bits though I can see how it is difficult not to condemn everything)

> sure, although if tribal differences are always experienced as fundamentally morally repugnant one might think the moral calibration is screwed a bit too tight.

They're not always experienced this way. But that's the trend in America.

> but even at my most contemptuous of a culture and a people I will at times be forced to admit, honestly, that they have behaviors that can also be considered admirable

Ya, I think it's something along the lines of "even a broken clock is right twice a day".

Do I need to give out a cookie when the clock tells me the correct time if it's fucking me on the time the rest of the day?

  • Even a developmentally disabled human tends to be significantly more complex than a stopped clock so the analogy doesn't work well.

    if anything it is more than a computer with a lousy video and sound card, you don't use it for games or streaming movies or most things, but due to some other things (which I am not going to take the time to create a plausible scenario why this should be) the computer is actually really superior as a server, so you have set it up for that. Do you give out a cookie for the computer that works really well at serving content over port 80 despite it sucks for anything you enjoy?

    • > Even a developmentally disabled human tends to be significantly more complex than a stopped clock so the analogy doesn't work well.

      I think it works perfectly, honestly. Maybe moreso after the above statement.

      > Do you give out a cookie for the computer that works really well at serving content over port 80 despite it sucks for anything you enjoy?

      No, I do not. Nor does the server ask for a cookie. It just does its job consistently without making a fuss. If governments could do that bare minimum thing, the world would be a better place.