← Back to context Comment by quaintdev 2 months ago Yeah I know how that sounds but it's the most logical explanation. 3 comments quaintdev Reply philipwhiuk 2 months ago Alternatively, they don't have a viable business model?This isn't rocket science. If your business can't exist within the law, it doesn't get to exist. wiseowise 2 months ago There’s no law that says you have to pay businesses because you make customers life easier.If ChatGPT answers a law question for you that you’d have to ask an expensive lawyer, are they supposed to pay the lawyer too? taormina 2 months ago Tell Uber you said hi.
philipwhiuk 2 months ago Alternatively, they don't have a viable business model?This isn't rocket science. If your business can't exist within the law, it doesn't get to exist. wiseowise 2 months ago There’s no law that says you have to pay businesses because you make customers life easier.If ChatGPT answers a law question for you that you’d have to ask an expensive lawyer, are they supposed to pay the lawyer too? taormina 2 months ago Tell Uber you said hi.
wiseowise 2 months ago There’s no law that says you have to pay businesses because you make customers life easier.If ChatGPT answers a law question for you that you’d have to ask an expensive lawyer, are they supposed to pay the lawyer too?
Alternatively, they don't have a viable business model?
This isn't rocket science. If your business can't exist within the law, it doesn't get to exist.
There’s no law that says you have to pay businesses because you make customers life easier.
If ChatGPT answers a law question for you that you’d have to ask an expensive lawyer, are they supposed to pay the lawyer too?
Tell Uber you said hi.