← Back to context

Comment by Griffinsauce

1 day ago

Three. He fired three people.

Just posting the "75%" without context is a bit of an odd choice. He explains why in the podcast, but it still feels like he should have specified immediately to avoid assumptions about scale.

He himself said "75%", nowhere in that thread does he say 3 people. That's why the headline is like that.

  • [flagged]

    • What? He could have said 3 if he wanted, but he wanted it to sound worse so he said 75. I know its inferrable how many people it is, but if the guy laying them off doesn't care to say the number, why should someone else when posting this?

      1 reply →