Comment by DonHopkins

That's a trite, low effort, worthless, content free comment, which totally misses the point and fails to engage. You haven't made any other comments contributing to this discussion, except that one shallow drive by complaint. If you're going to whine about using llms as a shell, then at least try to do better than an llm or redditor yourself.

So do you disagree with any of my points, or my direct replies to other people's points, or is that all you can think of to say, instead of engaging?

Do you prefer to use bash directly? Why? If not, then what is your alternative?

What do you think of Anthropic Skills? Have you used or made any yourself, or can you suggest any improvements? I've created 50+ skills, and I've suggested, implemented, and tested seven architectural extensions -- do you have any criticism of those?

https://github.com/SimHacker/moollm/tree/main/skills

Obviously you use llms yourself, so you're not a complete luddite, and you must have some deeper more substantial understanding and criticism than those two words from your own experience.

How do your own ideas that you blogged about in "My LLM System Prompt" compare to my ideas and experience, in your own "professional, no bullshit, scientific" opinion?

https://mahesh-hegde.github.io/posts/llm_system_prompt/

Your entire blog post on LLM prompts is "I don't like verbiage" in five sentences. Ironic, then, that your entire contribution here is two empty words. I made specific technical points, replied to real people, linked proof. 'Slop' is the new 'TL;DR' -- a confession of laziness dressed as critique. Calling substance slop while contributing nothing? That's actual slop.