← Back to context Comment by rootusrootus 2 days ago That was Beats. Pre acquisition IIRC, it was years ago. 2 comments rootusrootus Reply jasonlotito 2 days ago Can you give the source for that? The one posted shows the claim was debunked by the fact that they were not really Beats. rootusrootus 2 days ago You are right, my memory only includes the original report and not the follow-up that determined it was bunk. Sadly it is too far past my post so I cannot edit it. Apologies for persisting bad info
jasonlotito 2 days ago Can you give the source for that? The one posted shows the claim was debunked by the fact that they were not really Beats. rootusrootus 2 days ago You are right, my memory only includes the original report and not the follow-up that determined it was bunk. Sadly it is too far past my post so I cannot edit it. Apologies for persisting bad info
rootusrootus 2 days ago You are right, my memory only includes the original report and not the follow-up that determined it was bunk. Sadly it is too far past my post so I cannot edit it. Apologies for persisting bad info
Can you give the source for that? The one posted shows the claim was debunked by the fact that they were not really Beats.
You are right, my memory only includes the original report and not the follow-up that determined it was bunk. Sadly it is too far past my post so I cannot edit it. Apologies for persisting bad info