← Back to context Comment by resumenext 3 days ago [flagged] 6 comments resumenext Reply kaoD 3 days ago How so? resumenext 3 days ago It’s intended to be human readable, but it’s not and its slow adoption is proof of that. A random 10 digit string would arguably be better. pphysch 3 days ago You mean base64? 10 digits is only 10 billion addresses 1 reply → ceejayoz 3 days ago > It’s intended to be human readable…What? No.Facebook did some brute forcing to slip `facebook` into their Onion URLs, but no one's intended to be typing these things out. umanwizard 3 days ago > It’s intended to be human readableSays who?> slow adoption is proof of thatNo it's not. There are many plausible reasons for the slow pace of IPv6 adoption. Poor human-readability of addresses is among the least plausible.
kaoD 3 days ago How so? resumenext 3 days ago It’s intended to be human readable, but it’s not and its slow adoption is proof of that. A random 10 digit string would arguably be better. pphysch 3 days ago You mean base64? 10 digits is only 10 billion addresses 1 reply → ceejayoz 3 days ago > It’s intended to be human readable…What? No.Facebook did some brute forcing to slip `facebook` into their Onion URLs, but no one's intended to be typing these things out. umanwizard 3 days ago > It’s intended to be human readableSays who?> slow adoption is proof of thatNo it's not. There are many plausible reasons for the slow pace of IPv6 adoption. Poor human-readability of addresses is among the least plausible.
resumenext 3 days ago It’s intended to be human readable, but it’s not and its slow adoption is proof of that. A random 10 digit string would arguably be better. pphysch 3 days ago You mean base64? 10 digits is only 10 billion addresses 1 reply → ceejayoz 3 days ago > It’s intended to be human readable…What? No.Facebook did some brute forcing to slip `facebook` into their Onion URLs, but no one's intended to be typing these things out. umanwizard 3 days ago > It’s intended to be human readableSays who?> slow adoption is proof of thatNo it's not. There are many plausible reasons for the slow pace of IPv6 adoption. Poor human-readability of addresses is among the least plausible.
ceejayoz 3 days ago > It’s intended to be human readable…What? No.Facebook did some brute forcing to slip `facebook` into their Onion URLs, but no one's intended to be typing these things out.
umanwizard 3 days ago > It’s intended to be human readableSays who?> slow adoption is proof of thatNo it's not. There are many plausible reasons for the slow pace of IPv6 adoption. Poor human-readability of addresses is among the least plausible.
How so?
It’s intended to be human readable, but it’s not and its slow adoption is proof of that. A random 10 digit string would arguably be better.
You mean base64? 10 digits is only 10 billion addresses
1 reply →
> It’s intended to be human readable…
What? No.
Facebook did some brute forcing to slip `facebook` into their Onion URLs, but no one's intended to be typing these things out.
> It’s intended to be human readable
Says who?
> slow adoption is proof of that
No it's not. There are many plausible reasons for the slow pace of IPv6 adoption. Poor human-readability of addresses is among the least plausible.