← Back to context Comment by kaoD 4 days ago How so? 5 comments kaoD Reply resumenext 4 days ago It’s intended to be human readable, but it’s not and its slow adoption is proof of that. A random 10 digit string would arguably be better. pphysch 4 days ago You mean base64? 10 digits is only 10 billion addresses resumenext 3 days ago I was thinking of ipv5. ceejayoz 4 days ago > It’s intended to be human readable…What? No.Facebook did some brute forcing to slip `facebook` into their Onion URLs, but no one's intended to be typing these things out. umanwizard 4 days ago > It’s intended to be human readableSays who?> slow adoption is proof of thatNo it's not. There are many plausible reasons for the slow pace of IPv6 adoption. Poor human-readability of addresses is among the least plausible.
resumenext 4 days ago It’s intended to be human readable, but it’s not and its slow adoption is proof of that. A random 10 digit string would arguably be better. pphysch 4 days ago You mean base64? 10 digits is only 10 billion addresses resumenext 3 days ago I was thinking of ipv5. ceejayoz 4 days ago > It’s intended to be human readable…What? No.Facebook did some brute forcing to slip `facebook` into their Onion URLs, but no one's intended to be typing these things out. umanwizard 4 days ago > It’s intended to be human readableSays who?> slow adoption is proof of thatNo it's not. There are many plausible reasons for the slow pace of IPv6 adoption. Poor human-readability of addresses is among the least plausible.
pphysch 4 days ago You mean base64? 10 digits is only 10 billion addresses resumenext 3 days ago I was thinking of ipv5.
ceejayoz 4 days ago > It’s intended to be human readable…What? No.Facebook did some brute forcing to slip `facebook` into their Onion URLs, but no one's intended to be typing these things out.
umanwizard 4 days ago > It’s intended to be human readableSays who?> slow adoption is proof of thatNo it's not. There are many plausible reasons for the slow pace of IPv6 adoption. Poor human-readability of addresses is among the least plausible.
It’s intended to be human readable, but it’s not and its slow adoption is proof of that. A random 10 digit string would arguably be better.
You mean base64? 10 digits is only 10 billion addresses
I was thinking of ipv5.
> It’s intended to be human readable…
What? No.
Facebook did some brute forcing to slip `facebook` into their Onion URLs, but no one's intended to be typing these things out.
> It’s intended to be human readable
Says who?
> slow adoption is proof of that
No it's not. There are many plausible reasons for the slow pace of IPv6 adoption. Poor human-readability of addresses is among the least plausible.