← Back to context Comment by emilfihlman 1 day ago The source hasttybuf[2] =& ~010;Which is another bug. 1 comment emilfihlman Reply messe 1 day ago What's the bug? If you're referring to the =& syntax, then that's just how &= used to be written in older versions of C.
messe 1 day ago What's the bug? If you're referring to the =& syntax, then that's just how &= used to be written in older versions of C.
What's the bug? If you're referring to the =& syntax, then that's just how &= used to be written in older versions of C.