Comment by dheatov
21 hours ago
Assuming the actual price for many user is closer to 1k USD/mth than to 200 USD/mth, and the actual price is closer to their target margin to be a viable business, they're practically subsidising usage after 200 USD/mth. Together with other AI-TECH doing the same, they fabricate a false sense of "AI is capable AND affordable", which imo is evil.
There is nothing evil about prioritizing customer acquisition over immediate profit.
And yet in many cases there are regulations against it. Almost as though behavior that warps the market is generally undesirable.
Give me an example of one such regulation.
3 replies →