← Back to context Comment by simonw 15 hours ago Are you accusing the SF Standard of running a paid promotion without disclosing it as such? 5 comments simonw Reply ramon156 14 hours ago This is similar to a political campaign not telling you to vote on X, but still talking greatly about X. It's completely legal simonw 13 hours ago Here's the ethics policy for the SF Standard: https://sfstandard.com/ethics-standards/ ActionHank 5 hours ago It’s a puff piece with no substance that tries to frame the interviewee positively with no real apparent reason. barbarr 14 hours ago > He smirked. "Yes, I am."
ramon156 14 hours ago This is similar to a political campaign not telling you to vote on X, but still talking greatly about X. It's completely legal simonw 13 hours ago Here's the ethics policy for the SF Standard: https://sfstandard.com/ethics-standards/ ActionHank 5 hours ago It’s a puff piece with no substance that tries to frame the interviewee positively with no real apparent reason.
simonw 13 hours ago Here's the ethics policy for the SF Standard: https://sfstandard.com/ethics-standards/ ActionHank 5 hours ago It’s a puff piece with no substance that tries to frame the interviewee positively with no real apparent reason.
ActionHank 5 hours ago It’s a puff piece with no substance that tries to frame the interviewee positively with no real apparent reason.
This is similar to a political campaign not telling you to vote on X, but still talking greatly about X. It's completely legal
Here's the ethics policy for the SF Standard: https://sfstandard.com/ethics-standards/
It’s a puff piece with no substance that tries to frame the interviewee positively with no real apparent reason.
> He smirked. "Yes, I am."