← Back to context

Comment by a456463

2 days ago

Yup! Which is also the reason why I distrust projects like these in general: bold claims when there is nothing to be backed up with. What else is hiding behind such bold claims?

The claims, including in comments in this thread read to me as "I will make this claim". Then, someone points out that the claim is inaccurate. "I didn't really mean that, I meant slightly softer version". It feels disingenuous.

  • What I'm seeing is an Embassy dev giving hard evidence of how this can be used for real-time tasks ironically proving that the weirdly upset people, who are claiming no one here knows what they are talking about, are in fact the ones who don't know what they are talking about.

    • Hey: for this particular thread, the example claim in question is It obsoletes the need for a traditional RTOS, which isn't true. See elsewhere in this comments section as well, there are several good examples.