I think you are expecting some kind of collaborative OSS type of library.
For LLMs to have replaced Tailwind - in part by using it themselves - this does not have mean that there _will_ be another library to reuse. In the context of LLMs, it becomes so "cheap" to customize the webpage that a library is no longer needed.
Tailwind in and of itself can be considered a "highly structured LLM" - if they so took it that far.
Could?
I'll go a bit further.
I am 100% certain they will.
so why haven't they?
I think you are expecting some kind of collaborative OSS type of library.
For LLMs to have replaced Tailwind - in part by using it themselves - this does not have mean that there _will_ be another library to reuse. In the context of LLMs, it becomes so "cheap" to customize the webpage that a library is no longer needed.
Tailwind in and of itself can be considered a "highly structured LLM" - if they so took it that far.
The future will gradually become proprietary and non-textual programming languages, toolchains, and runtimes inaccessible to humans.
Looking forward to frontpage/dreamweaver levels of css soup already
is there a need?