Show HN: Ferrite – Markdown editor in Rust with native Mermaid diagram rendering

1 month ago (github.com)

Ferrite: Fast Markdown/Text/Code editor in Rust with native Mermaid diagrams

Built a Markdown editor using Rust + egui. v0.2.1 just dropped with major Mermaid improvements:

→ Native Mermaid diagrams - Flowcharts, sequence, state, ER, git graphs - pure Rust, no JS

→ Split view - Raw + rendered side-by-side with sync scrolling

→ Syntax highlighting - 40+ languages with large file optimization

→ JSON/YAML/TOML tree viewer - Structured editing with expand/collapse

→ Git integration - File tree shows modified/staged/untracked status

Also: minimap, zen mode, auto-save, session restore, code folding indicators.

~15MB binary, instant startup. Windows/Linux/macOS.

GitHub: https://github.com/OlaProeis/Ferrite

v0.2.2 coming soon with performance improvements for large files. Looking for feedback!

This is cool. I was hoping to see progress coming from Zed (e.g. because Tree-sitter → https://github.com/tree-sitter-grammars/tree-sitter-markdown) but it's exciting to see this. I'm a heavy Obsidian user, and I love it, but I'd love to see real alternatives focused on foundations.

It would be interesting to know more about the end-goal if any.

Best of luck! I'll watch this.

  • Thanks! The end-goal is a fast, native Markdown editor that "just works" - no Electron, no web tech, instant startup. v0.3.0 will extract Mermaid as a standalone crate and build a custom text editor widget to unlock features egui's TextEdit blocks (proper multi-cursor, code folding). Long-term: potentially extract the editor as a headless Rust library since that's missing in the ecosystem. See ROADMAP.md for details

    • Do people still use $language editors?

      My impression was that everyone uses their $EDITOR and integrates languages support via plugins. The only exception to this rule I know is Emacs (org mode). I really doubt a standalone md editor will get traction, no matter how good it is.

      6 replies →

  • Since you're an Obsidian user, can I please get your feedback on https://hyperclast.com/ which I'm building?

    (I'm not quite ready to do a Show HN yet, so please don't post it, but I'm ready for some early feedback if you'll indulge me)

    • You need something "more" on the website before you ask people to create an account. "Team workspace that stays fast" isn’t clear enough for me, at least. What is a workspace? What does the interface look like? Is it in the browser? Is it an app?

      People will go "what is this?", "huh, I’m not gonna make a user for this, can’t tell what it is". Those are my 2 cents.

      4 replies →

    • Disclaimer: I'm not your target audience, I don't care about collaboration or performance.

      - There's a heavy emphasis on performance. Are you sure customers care about that more than real time collaboration and self hosting? (I don't think they care about CRDTs.)

      - If I am experiencing pain because eg my Notion wiki is too big and is having serious performance issues, what I want to hear immediately is how you are going to help me migrate from Notion to your solution. Notion has a feature to export an entire workspace; can you ingest that and get me spun up with your product?

      - If I hear something is open source I expect to be able to try it out immediately without logging in. It looks like you can do that but when you hit "Get Started" it puts you into a registration flow.

      - You might take a look at how Zed is marketing themselves, they have a similar pitch (performance + realtime collaboration). The first thing they try to show you is a video where they demo the product and show how fast it is. (I think they focus too much on performance though.)

      - The frontend is a web app right? If possible rather than a video, embed the interface in your landing page. If possible, let them share their document and try out collaborating on it with someone or with another browser tab. Give them an opportunity to be impressed.

      I respect anyone who posts their work. Best of luck.

      4 replies →

    • The only thing I'll say is that it's great to see the feedback in this thread applied. It became very obvious to me what the tool is for and an abstract idea of what I can do with it.

      However as others have said:

      - A demo video would do a lot for your product.

      - nit: Real-time markdown -> change to something that emphasizes collaboration/collaborative editing. For two reason - it's a much more familiar term in the space you are building and it's easier to understand (I think) for more people.

      - A sample workspace (either public or a "starter workspace" that's available by default in a new account) that is non-trivial would be great to showcase your product. Look at obsidian using obsidian itself for it's own documentation site.

      - Your about page is very well written - I wonder if you can pull up somethings from there onto the main page. https://hyperclast.com/about/

      I didn't sign up yet however so can't provide more feedback.

      1 reply →

    • I use Obsidian a lot, but very few extra features or plugins. My first impression is that I don’t get what you’re making from the website. Any tool worth using in this space (which I vaguely understand to be using large collections of Markdown and/or realtime multiediting) is fast. Obsidian is fast. Zed is fast. It’s table stakes for the kind of person who would use this already.

      Is it just Zed + Obsidian? A good knowledge base that scales well and uses plain markdown, but has the fancy multi edit stuff?

      2 replies →

    • I am aware of the current issues with open source licensing, but for my needs I don’t trust the elastic style licensing, especially when it claims to be open source but I can’t fork it to protect myself from a future rug pull situation.

      I currently use Dendron in VS Code. Dendron is basically abandonware at this point because it couldn’t be monetized, but because it’s Apache licensed, I can fork it if I want, and continue to use it until something better comes along, or even modify it for my own needs.

      It’s very hard to be successful financially in this space. Notion did it at the right time, but they are targeting enterprises who are willing to give their data to them, not individuals who want to run their own setup.

      Maybe you can compete with Notion, but I’m not willing to put my stuff in a system that may not be around in a couple years, and I don’t have a license for.

> Platform Note: Ferrite has been primarily developed and tested on Windows. While it should work on Linux and macOS, these platforms have not been extensively tested.

Neat! Lately on Windows I've felt like a 2nd class citizen.

> AI Disclosure: This project is 100% AI-generated code.

Oh.

Well, at least they're up front about it.

  • This disclosure has been added today, after some users here called them out for hiding that they were using AI to build it.

    • Thanks for clarifying. That deflates the last of any excitement I had about this. Moving on...

Will need a magnifying glass to see the text on the screenshots.

I find it makes sense to take screenshots in a window big enough to show what's going on, but no bigger. This means probably not full screen, or maximised, especially if you're running at a very high resolution. If there's a lot of dead/empty space in the window that's a signal it's too big. This way you guarantee the screenshots are readable without zooming in, on smaller displays than your own, for example mobile.

  • Great feedback, thank you! You're absolutely right — the screenshots are taken at high resolution, which makes them hard to read on smaller displays.

    I'll retake them with a more focused window size and less dead space. Appreciate the specific guidance!

    • My pleasure! Thank you for being receptive and open minded to such constructive criticism.

AI generated code, AI generated HN post, AI generated comments…

  • I'm trying to figure out why this post didn't get run out of town like several others recently, for starters it hit several favorite discussion topics.

  • I missed this disclaimer about it being 100% AI-generated.

    In one second I went from "looks cool" to "I don't want to touch it"

    • Why? It's not like LLMs can't generate solid code, and it's not like people don't guide them carefully to produce the code they want.

      I guess you're assuming he just gave a simple prompt to build an app that wasn't checked in any way, but why?

      4 replies →

I happily paid money for Typora, which does roughly the same thing for just Markdown without support for JSON, Yaml (that I know of). This feels like a ripe space, especially with LLMs eagerly outputting reams of parseable text with embedded diagrams.

  • The $15 price tag for Typora seems a bit steep considering the fundamental features it provides.

    • The price of a fancy burger doesn't seem all that unreasonable for a piece of software one finds even moderately useful (of course, depending on your local exchange rate that may be more or less true)

    • Sometimes you're a patron of the arts more than an engineer on these types of purchases, I think

  • Thanks! Typora is great - Ferrite aims for similar polish but with native Mermaid, structured data support (JSON/YAML/TOML tree viewer), and the pipeline feature for shell integration. And it's open source!

  • +1 happy user of Typora. I really like its ability to auto-create a related assets folder for embedded media as it’s dragged into a doc.

Nice to see an egui project that doesn't have super obvious egui aesthetics.

How did you find working with egui?

  • egui is fantastic for rapid prototyping - immediate mode makes state management simple. Main limitation: TextEdit isn't designed for code editors (no multi-cursor, can't hide folded text). v0.3.0 will replace it with a custom widget. The default styling does scream "egui" - spent time on custom theming to avoid that

Nice to see native markdown rendering rather than relying on spawning chromium and taking screenshots like some other libraries do!

  • One major downside of native rendering is the lack of layout consistency if you’re editing natively and then sharing anywhere else where the diagram will be rendered by mermaid.js.

  • Valid point! Native rendering won't be pixel-perfect with mermaid.js. The trade-off is speed and no JS runtime. For documents staying in Ferrite, it's great. For sharing, we're adding SVG export in v0.3.0 so you can use mermaid.js for final renders if needed.

Why did you remove AI agent configurations and instructions from the repo? See .gitignore

  • Fair point - I should be more transparent. Yes, Claude assisted significantly with development. The .gitignore excludes AI config files because they where not needed in the project and aren't useful to others. I'll add a note to the README about AI-assisted development. The code is reviewed and understood, not blindly accepted.

    • Could you estimate how much was written by AI vs you? Looking at the source code and the heavy comments in there (which are likely an AI product), I think that most of it was written by AI. Same with the whole docs directory.

      google says that assisting means:

      assist /əˈsɪst/ help (someone), typically by doing a share of the work.

      So in this case... wouldn't the relationship be inverted, e.g. you assisting AI? (semi joking ;))

      6 replies →

    • Thanks for your reply. Mine wasn't a critique but a genuine curiosity. I was interested to see what where the base instructions used for a rust project.

      > The .gitignore excludes AI config files because they where not needed in the project and aren't useful to others

      I would disagree with this. Since it's an open-source project it would be beneficial to everyone, especially to future contributors, to agree in good code practices and conventions when using LLMs. I would say they're really useful.

      1 reply →

  • It's vibe coded. The entire project is only 10 commits, a few of them are giant with a bunch of markdown files full of emojis in the docs/ folder.

Seems like Mermaid parsing and layout would be a useful crate as by itself. I would enjoy a fast mermaid layout command line tool with svg/pdf/png support, which I think would be quite feasible to implement with such a crate.

  • This is exactly the plan for v0.3.0! Extracting the ~7000 line Mermaid renderer into a standalone crate with SVG/PNG output and CLI support. Pure Rust, WASM-compatible. Stay tuned!

    • That's great! I'm pretty interested in that. I hooked up `mark` [1] at work to upload md files to our internal confluence and would love to integrate a native tool to convert Mermaid diagrams to a png rather using mark's built-in system which calls out to mermaid.js and thus needs us to vendor chromium, which I'd rather avoid!

      [1] https://github.com/kovetskiy/mark

Looking at the Screenshots, this would've taken days/weeks e.g. 5 years ago. Now this seems to be vibe coded in 2 sessions. Crazy world we live in.

  • Ha! I appreciate the compliment (I think?). To be transparent: yes, AI tools were used during development — they're fantastic for boilerplate, documentation, and exploring unfamiliar APIs.

    But this wasn't "2 sessions" — Ferrite has been in development for months with ~30,000 lines of Rust across 50+ modules. The Mermaid renderer alone is ~6000 lines of layout algorithms (Sugiyama-style graph layout, sequence diagram activation tracking, nested state machines, etc.).

    AI helped ALOT, but there's no "generate full app" prompt that produces working text editors with native diagram rendering, rope-based text buffers, and custom window chrome. Still takes understanding the domain.

    That said, you're right that the development velocity is higher than 5 years ago. Exciting times!

    • I want to see the work done by human beings, not just the AI output. "Open source" to me is sharing the input required, idealistically as much as possible. Without including at least prompts and separating AI output from manual revisions this GitHub repo feels more like publishing "open weights" does, definitely useful but for the most part only for its intended purpose instead of also teaching how to do something similar myself. (See also recent discussion about Android publishing source less often: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46524379)

      None of this should be considered critical of this project specifically, very few share "how the sausage is made". You're breaking new ground with a comment about being AI generated prominent in the README, I hope that catches on.

      4 replies →

    • Yep, it always seems easy from the outside until you start doing it. Then unless you are doing a crud web app you quickly run into issues where unless you know what you are doing- Claude Code won’t help you.

      1 reply →

  • It can be vibe-coded quickly but can also be done rather quickly without ai - the heavy lifting is UI lib from Zed. That is the real unlock in apps like this.

    • Small correction: Ferrite uses egui (by Emil Ernerfeldt), not anything from Zed. Different ecosystem entirely.

      - Zed uses their own gpui framework - Ferrite uses egui — an immediate-mode GUI library

      egui is great for rapid development but has limitations. The v0.3.0 custom editor widget is specifically because egui's built-in TextEdit blocks features like proper multi-cursor and code folding. We're not getting much "for free" there — the Mermaid renderer, syntax highlighting integration, and view synchronization are all custom.

      That said, egui definitely accelerated the initial UI work. Credit where due!

      1 reply →

Like the idea but it spawns a terminal on startup on Mac and is not WYSIWYG (like Obsidian). Hope this project develops into usable state soon.

  • Thanks for reporting! This is a packaging issue - need to create a proper .app bundle. On the roadmap for v0.3.0 (macOS signing & notarization). For now, running from terminal is the workaround.

Made the fan in my Windows 11 laptop spin up.

  • This is why I prefer clunky hardware with heating cpus and a slow disk. You can easily feel that you wrote bad code from audio and tactile feedback.

    • I’ve heard of people doing ambient performance profiling by instrumenting their code to insert clicks into an audio buffer based on a high precision clock and piping it out a speaker. You get to learn the sound of your code at 44.1KHz

      3 replies →

  • Which view/file caused this? v0.2.2 (coming soon) has significant performance optimizations for large files - deferred syntax highlighting, galley caching. If you can reproduce, please open an issue with details!

    • I launched the file, typed:

      >Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their party. >test

      and selected the last and made it bold using the formatting bar.

      1 reply →

v0.2.2 just released — addressing several issues raised in this thread:

- CJK font support 1 — Korean/Chinese/Japanese characters now render properly

- CLI improvements (#9, #10) — ferrite file.md now works, plus --version and --help flags

- Undo/redo fixes 2 — Fixed scroll reset and focus issues

- Default view mode setting 3 — Can now set split/preview as default

- Configurable log level 4 — Reduce stderr noise

- Ubuntu 22.04 compatibility 5 — .deb now works on 22.04+

Thanks to everyone who reported issues! Download: https://github.com/OlaProeis/Ferrite/releases/tag/v0.2.2

also, on the markdown front, I saw this cool library https://github.com/Canop/termimad gaining popularity

  • Termimad author here: I’m always a bit afraid, when I see the popularity of this crate, that it might be undue and that people may lose time trying to use it when it’s probably not the tool they need.

    Termimad isn’t a full-fledged TUI framework. It can be used to build TUIs (I made broot, bacon, safecloset, etc. with it), but if you want to quickly build a TUI and compose UI components and widgets, you’ll probably find it much easier to choose a real TUI framework (e.g. ratatui).

    Termimad isn’t a generic Markdown viewer either. Markdown is mainly used as a language for the developer to describe parts of the interface—especially rich text—inside a TUI. People interested in rendering arbitrary Markdown files will find that it lacks features such as image rendering.

We need privacy-focused Obsidian alternative (which doesn't store unencrypted text files on disk), excited to see a potential player written in my tech stack, meaning it should be easy to extend!

  • Ferrite is privacy-focused in that it's fully offline — no telemetry, no cloud sync, no accounts, no network calls (even Mermaid diagrams render locally in pure Rust).

    However, files are stored as plain text, same as Obsidian/VS Code/any text editor. Encryption at rest isn't currently on the roadmap.

    For encrypted storage, you might consider: - Using Ferrite with an encrypted volume (VeraCrypt, LUKS, FileVault) - git-crypt for encrypted git repos

    That said, if there's strong interest in built-in encryption (vault-style or file-level), I'd love to hear more about the use case. Would you want password-protected vaults? Per-file encryption? Something else?

    • I want cold storage encryption which is cross-platform and doesn't require FUSE and such. Current solutions are all either non-cross-platform or overkill, so I'm still using Obsidian non-encrypted. It's a matter of default and ease of use.

      That said, I've checked Ferrite out – unfortunately there's a very long way to go before it becomes Obsidian-ish (left and right panel, add tabs, hide the top formatting bar), better focus on those features. If it becomes close enough – I'll implement the encryption myself :)

      4 replies →

The main issue is that Markdown remains a pretty primitive language to write documents in, with dozens of incompatible extensions all over the place.

I don't know if it's the best format to focus on.

  • Fair point about fragmentation! Ferrite uses Comrak which implements CommonMark + GitHub Flavored Markdown (GFM) — arguably the closest thing to a "standard" we have.

    We chose Markdown because: - It's what most developers already use (README files, documentation, wikis) - Plain text files are portable, grep-able, git-friendly, and won't lock you in - GFM covers tables, task lists, strikethrough, and autolinks which handles 90% of use cases

    We also support JSON, YAML, and TOML with native tree viewers. Wikilinks ([[links]]) and backlinks are planned for v0.3.0 for folks wanting Obsidian-style knowledge bases.

    That said, I'd love to hear what format you'd prefer — always interested in expanding support!

I don't want to diminish the effort put into this project, but it's a reminder to me of just how many markdown editors there are out there! And yet I'm still searching for the holy grail:

- wysiwyg editor (not live preview)

- simplicity: single binary that can be pointed at a directory of markdown files

- fast launch time, low latency UI

- cross platform

- comes with basic 'extras' like tables & code block support

I actually really like the Confluence editor experience. If I could get that in an FOSS 'offline' package, my needs would be met.

  • You've basically described Ferrite's design goals! Let me check the boxes:

    Single binary — ~15MB, point it at a directory with ferrite ./notes/ or open workspace via UI

    Fast launch, low latency — Native Rust/egui, instant startup, no Electron

    Cross platform — Windows/Linux/macOS

    Tables & code blocks — GFM tables, syntax-highlighted code blocks (40+ languages)

    WYSIWYG — This is where it gets nuanced. Ferrite has three modes:

    - Rendered mode — Click-to-edit rendered Markdown (closest to WYSIWYG)

    - Split view — Raw editor + live preview side-by-side

    - Raw mode — Plain text editing

    It's not pure "type and it formats inline" like Typora or Confluence. The Rendered mode lets you click elements to edit them, but it's not seamless WYSIWYG yet.

    If you're looking for true inline WYSIWYG, Typora is probably closest. But if split view + rendered mode works for you, give Ferrite a try — it hits the other criteria well.

Any interest in a plugin system similar to Obsidian?

  • Definitely interested in the concept! Though it's not on the immediate roadmap.

    A few thoughts: - Obsidian's plugin system is JavaScript-based, which makes sense for Electron. For a native Rust app, we'd likely want something like WASM plugins or Lua scripting. - v0.3.0 includes plans to extract the Mermaid renderer as a standalone crate and potentially the editor widget as a library — this modular architecture would be a foundation for future extensibility.

    What kinds of plugins would you want? Knowing specific use cases would help prioritize. Custom renderers? File format converters? External tool integrations?

    In the meantime, Ferrite has a "Live Pipeline" feature that lets you pipe JSON/YAML through shell commands (jq, yq, etc.) — not a full plugin system, but useful for custom transformations.

    • > Definitely interested in the concept! Though it's not on the immediate roadmap. > > A few thoughts: - Obsidian's plugin system is JavaScript-based, which makes sense for Electron. For a native Rust app, we'd likely want something like WASM plugins or Lua scripting. - v0.3.0 includes plans to extract the Mermaid renderer as a standalone crate and potentially the editor widget as a library — this modular architecture would be a foundation for future extensibility. > > What kinds of plugins would you want? Knowing specific use cases would help prioritize. Custom renderers? File format converters? External tool integrations? > > In the meantime, Ferrite has a "Live Pipeline" feature that lets you pipe JSON/YAML through shell commands (jq, yq, etc.) — not a full plugin system, but useful for custom transformations.

      Personally, I think there's two plugins I would really want.

      1. Peer-to-peer syncing of notes. I do hope there will be a mobile version someday of your app. Most of my quick jotting of notes happens on mobile and heavy editing happens on traditional laptop/desktop. It would be nice just to scan a QR code to pair up devices and away we go. Optionally a small binary to be the sync server for self host for hub and spoke design. I love Git integration, but we want to take this at a level for those that aren't technically inclined.

      2. A robust API for tool integration. Being able to plug in external tools is super helpful for streamlining workflows. In addition I've used it to make accessibility tools integrate for command and control.

      I do like the fact that Obsidian has vaults that are essentially separate profiles that have separate vaults location settings and plugins.

      1 reply →

Very cool. The one thing that prevents me from trying this out as a potential note-taking daily driver is the lack of support for LaTeX.

I recently switched from Obsidian to Zettlr due to some rendering and performance issues on Linux, and it's been a great experience. However, I always like to see new entrants in the arena.

  • LaTeX support is a reasonable request! It's not on the immediate roadmap, but here's my thinking:

    Options considered: - KaTeX/MathJax-style rendering (would need a Rust math renderer or JS bridge) - Typst integration (Rust-native, modern alternative to LaTeX) - External tool pipeline (render via pandoc/LaTeX CLI)

    Typst is interesting since it's also Rust-based and simpler than full LaTeX. Would inline math ($x^2$) and display math ($$...$$) cover your use case, or do you need full document features?

    Added to the roadmap consideration list. Thanks for the feedback!

  • Agreed. Having an open-source alternative to (the otherwise excellent) Typora would be fantastic; as far as I can tell the main feature Ferrite is currently lacking to be used for most (all?) applications where I use Typora is a way to easily write and render maths formula. (As far as I am concerned, support for TeX math would be ideal due to wide support from the existing ecosystem; but Typst would work too.)

    • Thanks! TeX math support ($...$ and $$...$$) is planned for v0.4.0. We're going pure Rust (no JS runtimes), targeting common LaTeX syntax. See the planning doc on github (docs folder) for details.

Looks interesting! I’m discouraged from using mermaid and D2’s online playground for privacy reasons and have hand on my roadmap to get a local editor. This might be it! Does it support theming of mermaid diagrams, I noted the style keywords were in the roadmap still.

  • Great catch! Mermaid styling syntax (style and classDef directives) is on the roadmap for v0.3.0. Currently the diagrams render with Ferrite's theme colors (light/dark).

    For privacy, you're in the right place — Ferrite's Mermaid rendering is 100% native Rust, no JavaScript, no external services, no network calls. All ~6000 lines of diagram rendering happen locally. We're even planning to extract this as a standalone crate so others can use it.

It’s a cool name but there is already another project called ferrite, related to audio recording. https://www.wooji-juice.com/products/ferrite/

  • Thanks for flagging this! You're right — Wooji-Juice's Ferrite is a well-known iOS audio recording app.

    The name collision is unfortunate. We picked "Ferrite" for the magnetic/persistent storage connotation (ferrite cores were early computer memory). Different domain (text editor vs audio), different platforms (desktop vs iOS), but I understand the SEO/discoverability concern.

    Open to suggestions if the community feels strongly about a rename! Though at this stage, with GitHub issues, releases, and now HN discussion, there's some established presence.

Slightly off topic: is there any editor (and data format) that supports re-arranging mermaid charts? I often find myself wanting to slightly tweak the way the chart is rendered, e.g. moving around boxes so that some of them are clustered in a specific area etc.

  • Currently Mermaid doesn't support manual positioning — the layout is algorithmic (Sugiyama-style for flowcharts). Some workarounds: - Use subgraph blocks to cluster related nodes - Adjust edge order in source to influence layout - D2 (another diagram language) has better manual positioning

    For v0.3.0's standalone crate, I'm considering whether to expose layout hints. What specific use case do you have — documentation, architecture diagrams?

    • Mostly clustering and sorting, but most importantly, I use diagrams not only as a tool for communication, but also as a tool to think visually. Moving boxes around would be a huge benefit for that use case, while I still want to have the diagram as code for version control etc pp

      2 replies →

Doesn't install on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS due to dependecy problems. Filed a bug: https://github.com/OlaProeis/Ferrite/issues/6

  • Thanks for reporting! This is a build environment issue - v0.2.1 was built on Ubuntu 24.04 which has newer glibc (2.39) and libssl3t64.

    *Fix:* I've updated the CI to build on Ubuntu 22.04, which will make the .deb compatible with 22.04+.

    This will be included in v0.2.2. For now, workarounds: 1. Use the `ferrite-linux-x64.tar.gz` (standalone binary) instead of .deb 2. Build from source: `cargo build --release`

    Sorry for the inconvenience!

seems like a promising alternative to obsidian, but missing [[wikilinks]] and back references

  • Not yet! [[wikilinks]] and backlinks are natural additions. I will add it to the Roadmap? Love community input on what Obsidian features matter most!

  • Yes! I was looking at it and hoping they had that feature already. I so want an Obsidian alternative to exist just in case.

    Thanks for posting the GitHub issue!

Is mermaid rendering implemented in Rust, or are you running mermaid.js in a JS interpreter somewhere?

On other systems I’ve run into challenges rendering markdown documents with many mermaid diagrams in them. It would be nice to have a more robust way to do this.

Hey OP, curious how much experience you have with Rust, given that this is the only rust repo I see in your profile.

  • This is my only public Rust repo — I have some ongoing private projects in Rust, so I'm familiar with the ecosystem (cargo, crates, the borrow checker experience, etc.).

    That said, to be fully transparent: as I disclosed elsewhere in this thread, the Ferrite codebase is 100% AI-generated (Claude via Cursor). I direct the development, test, and iterate, but I haven't written the Rust by hand for this project.

    So my Rust experience is more "ecosystem familiarity + reading AI-generated code" than "battle-hardened Rustacean." This project is partly a learning exercise — seeing how far AI-assisted development can go while picking up Rust patterns along the way.

I don't know much about the GUI space. I would love your take on why did you went with egui instead of guirs

  • Good question! A few reasons for egui over gtk-rs/iced/others:

    - Immediate mode — egui redraws every frame, which makes state management simpler (no callback hell). Great for prototyping.

    - Pure Rust, minimal deps — egui is self-contained. gtk-rs requires GTK installed on the system.

    - Cross-platform out of the box — Same code runs on Windows/Linux/macOS/Web

    - Rapid iteration — Hot reload-friendly, easy to experiment with layouts

    Trade-offs: egui's TextEdit isn't designed for code editors (no multi-cursor, can't hide folded text), which is why v0.3.0 will replace it with a custom widget.

Wish there was something like Mermaid for typical AWS Architecture diagrams.

Something that doesn't suck like draw.io!

  • Interesting use case! Mermaid doesn't have native AWS icons, but for v0.3.0's standalone crate, we could potentially support custom shapes/icons. D2 has better icon support if you need that now.

    What specific diagram types do you need — network topology, service flows, infrastructure layout?

For those who, like me, read this and thought "what the hell is a mermaid diagram?", apparently it is a method to describe simple flow diagrams using markdown-like text. More here: https://mermaid.js.org/

  • Next time you're vibe coding something, have the system generate a mermaid diagram to show its understanding. Though visual generation can be hard for models, structure/topology in formats like mermaid is pretty gettable.

    I've even found sonnet and opus to be quite capable of generating json describing nodes and edges. I had them generate directed acyclic processing graphs for a GUI LLM data flow editor that I built (also with Claude - https://nodecul.es/ if curious)

Whats the advantage of using Ferrite versus VS Code with a Mermaid extension?

  • > - ~15MB vs ~300MB+ (no Electron) > - Instant startup vs seconds > - Native Mermaid rendering (no extension juggling) > - Built-in JSON/YAML tree viewer with pipeline shell integration > - Session restore, minimap, zen mode baked in > > If you live in VS Code already, an extension might be fine. Ferrite is for those wanting a focused, fast Markdown environment.