← Back to context Comment by gnopgnip 1 month ago If they were twice as efficient, you would only need to run half as many and spend less. 2 comments gnopgnip Reply asa400 25 days ago This makes no sense. If they were better and cost less I would use them for even more work. I'd run more tests, more kinds of tests, more builds, etc. This is classic Jevons paradox territory. gnopgnip 24 days ago Most businesses would not double their use if the cost dropped by half. There are other bottlenecks, not price elastic
asa400 25 days ago This makes no sense. If they were better and cost less I would use them for even more work. I'd run more tests, more kinds of tests, more builds, etc. This is classic Jevons paradox territory. gnopgnip 24 days ago Most businesses would not double their use if the cost dropped by half. There are other bottlenecks, not price elastic
gnopgnip 24 days ago Most businesses would not double their use if the cost dropped by half. There are other bottlenecks, not price elastic
This makes no sense. If they were better and cost less I would use them for even more work. I'd run more tests, more kinds of tests, more builds, etc. This is classic Jevons paradox territory.
Most businesses would not double their use if the cost dropped by half. There are other bottlenecks, not price elastic