← Back to context Comment by jemmyw 19 hours ago Why did you use `track` for variables and `#` for lists instead of using the same syntax for both? 2 comments jemmyw Reply javatuts 18 hours ago Scalars and collections have different update semantics. track() is for atomic updates, # is for structural mutations — separate syntax makes reactive tracking and optimization simpler. henryhale 13 hours ago why not abstract that away so that `track()` can do it all? It would be alot easier to work with.
javatuts 18 hours ago Scalars and collections have different update semantics. track() is for atomic updates, # is for structural mutations — separate syntax makes reactive tracking and optimization simpler. henryhale 13 hours ago why not abstract that away so that `track()` can do it all? It would be alot easier to work with.
henryhale 13 hours ago why not abstract that away so that `track()` can do it all? It would be alot easier to work with.
Scalars and collections have different update semantics. track() is for atomic updates, # is for structural mutations — separate syntax makes reactive tracking and optimization simpler.
why not abstract that away so that `track()` can do it all? It would be alot easier to work with.