Comment by dangoodmanUT
6 hours ago
But it’s not theft, because you’re not redistributing. It’s allowed, just like humans are allowed to learn from copyrighted content.
6 hours ago
But it’s not theft, because you’re not redistributing. It’s allowed, just like humans are allowed to learn from copyrighted content.
Sure. But if I see listen to some song, and copy it, and release it, I could get sued. Even if I claim that I'm merely inspired by the original content - the court doesn't care.
You don't need to redistribute the original material, it's enough that you just copied it.
> But if I see listen to some song, and copy it, and release it, I could get sued.
This is what should be fixed in the first place, then. You shouldn't get sued from what you do with your copy of a song.
> just like humans are allowed to learn from copyrighted content
humans learning : machines learning == whale swimming : submarine swimming
It's not the exact 100% same thing. Therefore you cannot base any rights on it.
If you still don't buy it, consider this analogy:
killing a human vs. destroying a machine
Thank god that we're not using your line of thinking here.
[dead]