Comment by pilif
11 hours ago
It wasn't meant as a rebuttal. Just as a point of thought: By showing that at least one application doesn't exhibit the problem, I thought I was showing that the problem might not be related to the Tahoe redesign at all but might have other causes.
It definitely serves to prove that this is not a design-issue but just a simple bug and thus has at least some chance of being fixed.
FWIW, I cannot reproduce the issue demonstrated in the original article with any window of any application on my machine (M1 Mac Studio), but I thought that listing a very commonly used application alone would be enough to challenge the article's assertion ("the macOS designers are stupid because they make me do something that doesn't make sense in order to resize windows").
> It wasn't meant as a rebuttal.
“As much as I like to *” is a common way to start a rebuttal (the subsequent “I’m not going to see/do that” is implied by that turn of phrase).
> but I thought that listing a very commonly used application alone would be enough to challenge the article's assertion
So it was a rebuttal? Why the disingenuous doublethink?