← Back to context Comment by PaulDavisThe1st 3 days ago I don't see a need to reconcile them. 2 comments PaulDavisThe1st Reply viccis 3 days ago Which is why it's incoherent! PaulDavisThe1st 3 days ago I'm not clear that it has to be coherent at this point in the history of our understanding of cognition. We barely know what we're even talking about most of the time ...
viccis 3 days ago Which is why it's incoherent! PaulDavisThe1st 3 days ago I'm not clear that it has to be coherent at this point in the history of our understanding of cognition. We barely know what we're even talking about most of the time ...
PaulDavisThe1st 3 days ago I'm not clear that it has to be coherent at this point in the history of our understanding of cognition. We barely know what we're even talking about most of the time ...
Which is why it's incoherent!
I'm not clear that it has to be coherent at this point in the history of our understanding of cognition. We barely know what we're even talking about most of the time ...