← Back to context Comment by breppp 2 days ago unjustified preferential treatment over jpegxl a format google also had created 6 comments breppp Reply archerx 2 days ago They helped create jpegXL but they are not the sole owner like they are with webp. There is a difference. breppp 2 days ago a better argument might be that chrome protects their own vs a research group in google switzerland, however as other mentioned the security implications of another unsafe binary parser in a browser is hardly worth it archerx 2 days ago Webp has had major vulnerabilities.https://blog.cloudflare.com/uncovering-the-hidden-webp-vulne... 3 replies →
archerx 2 days ago They helped create jpegXL but they are not the sole owner like they are with webp. There is a difference. breppp 2 days ago a better argument might be that chrome protects their own vs a research group in google switzerland, however as other mentioned the security implications of another unsafe binary parser in a browser is hardly worth it archerx 2 days ago Webp has had major vulnerabilities.https://blog.cloudflare.com/uncovering-the-hidden-webp-vulne... 3 replies →
breppp 2 days ago a better argument might be that chrome protects their own vs a research group in google switzerland, however as other mentioned the security implications of another unsafe binary parser in a browser is hardly worth it archerx 2 days ago Webp has had major vulnerabilities.https://blog.cloudflare.com/uncovering-the-hidden-webp-vulne... 3 replies →
archerx 2 days ago Webp has had major vulnerabilities.https://blog.cloudflare.com/uncovering-the-hidden-webp-vulne... 3 replies →
They helped create jpegXL but they are not the sole owner like they are with webp. There is a difference.
a better argument might be that chrome protects their own vs a research group in google switzerland, however as other mentioned the security implications of another unsafe binary parser in a browser is hardly worth it
Webp has had major vulnerabilities.
https://blog.cloudflare.com/uncovering-the-hidden-webp-vulne...
3 replies →