Comment by cmrdporcupine
2 days ago
Right? "I find these matters are often more complex than I can understand from a headline but this feels like..."
Drive-by insinuation rather than argumentation.
2 days ago
Right? "I find these matters are often more complex than I can understand from a headline but this feels like..."
Drive-by insinuation rather than argumentation.
I mean there were conversations in closed rooms nobody outside of the room knows about. What we know publicly is they refused the funding because it required them to drop DEI activities, which not only would have solved their funding issues but was the morally correct thing to do. The PSF should be focused on improving Python, it shouldn't be a political organization.
OK, thanks for making your position clear. You disagree with some of the core mission of the PSF. Luckily you are in the minority and the PSF is carrying on.
> You disagree with some of the core mission of the PSF.
It seems he disagrees with the approach rather than the core mission; suggesting that instead of relying on reparations, to use those resources instead to fix the core issues with Python that demand those reparations in the first place.
Is he in the minority though? Remind me again who won the popular vote two years ago.
Turns out many people aren't big on racial discrimination "but hip and cool B-) this time". When the core principle of an organization is at conflict with the concept of hiring any ethnicity with no specific preference, you have a racist organization.
So deviating from part of their core mission is the "morally correct thing to do"?