← Back to context

Comment by JCattheATM

2 days ago

> As another poster has already pointed out to you, the person holding the blank piece of paper was not arrested.

I was under the impression it was not a single incident, but that's great that it wasn't.

The bigger problem, though, was people being arrested for holding up "not my king" or similar signs. According to one site[0], there were 64 arrests that day. I don't think it matters that no charges were filed or whatever, what matters is they were taken at the time for expressing an opinion.

> All of this was widely reported in the British media and generally agreed to be a bad thing, so it doesn't really fit with your narrative of Brits being in denial about these problems.

That's also good to know. I should have been clearer, but I meant within the context of my experience online. I also don't know that they are truly in denial, it just seems they are overly defensive about it and want to point out the US is worse in various ways.

> That's what people actually object to, but you misinterpret these objections as a defense of police overreach.

I'm misinterpreting anything, and certainly not in this discussion. In past discussions, closer to the coronation, there were Brits being very active in downplaying the arrests, that to me would seem to be denying there was an issue. If it was widely reported in British media as a bad thing, it would seem these particular people being in denial were outliers.

[0] https://hnksolicitors.com/news/met-police-regrets-coronation...

Ok, but please just do a quick search and check your facts before kicking off a long discussion thread on a false basis. I promise you that a lot of the pushback you're getting from Brits is down to the factual inaccuracies and exaggerations in your posts, not any great love we have for police crackdowns on peaceful protests.

  • > Ok, but please just do a quick search and check your facts before kicking off a long discussion thread on a false basis.

    My facts here would have been previous HN discussions that would have been very hard to find.

    > I promise you that a lot of the pushback you're getting from Brits is down to the factual inaccuracies and exaggerations in your posts

    No, that isn't the case, and you're not in a position to promise that; it's an assumption you're making, and I would ask you to question your motivation for doing so.

    In the previous posts I was using as an example discussion the coronation, people were downplaying protestors being arrested for holding up signs. Nothing was being exaggerated, all the facts were accurate as they had just happened - sources were abundant.