← Back to context

Comment by sanity

2 days ago

If anyone cares about the truth he explained what happened in detail in an interview at the time: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_bv1jfYYu4

Seems reasonable. He makes a provocative statement for ppl in his audience to draw their attention and make the important point it’s not okay (we should avoid) ppl who dislike us based on skin color. And he makes the further point he agrees there is still systemic racism against black folks and it’s a big problem. And yet, as you see in response to your posting of the video, ppl still dismiss it because they’d rather hold on to the soundbite to maintain their outrage, rather than understand the guy’s position.

  • Reading sound takes like this vs seemingly everyone on reddit celebrating his death makes me quite sad.

  • His take is stupid even if you give him the benefit of the doubt and believe his claim at face value. You shouldn’t avoid people that dislike you in this manner because it perpetuates the problem to eternity. It is essentially the same concept as segregation: well, we can’t ever get along so we’ll just exist in separate spaces!

    We literally tried that already and it didn’t work out so well.

    I hate to say this but you control your destiny when it comes to your reputation. If you want people to celebrate your life instead of celebrating your death, spend your life being nice to people lifting them up.

    Scott Adams didn’t do that. We are all free to feel however we want to feel about him. Don’t worry, his feelings won’t be hurt, he’s dead.

Most non-racists don’t need to spend 30 minutes on cable news explaining themselves to save face.

Saying something publicly is an action. Depending on what you say, you can’t take it back. If you tell your wife you think her friend is hot and you want a threesome you can’t take that back.

I also think you as the commenter should think a little bit about what motivates you to defend this guy. Why does he as a dead famous comic book author need his reputation defended? Why is it so important that we don’t see him as a racist asshole? What do you get out of that? Why not just let his own mistakes speak for themselves?

  • > Most non-racists don’t need to spend 30 minutes on cable news explaining themselves to save face.

    Most people never get interviewed on cable news at all, so that’s not a meaningful baseline. When someone is publicly accused, explaining yourself publicly is a predictable response, not evidence of guilt.

    > Saying something publicly is an action. You can’t take it back.

    Of course you can clarify or correct yourself—people misspeak all the time. Whether that matters depends on whether listeners are interested in understanding or just in cancelling someone they don't like.

    > Why do you feel the need to defend him?

    Because I’ve listened to hundreds of hours of Scott Adams over many years, and I’m confident I understand his views far better than people judging him from short, out-of-context clips.

    I don’t get anything out of this except insisting that the truth matters. Even when the person involved is unpopular or dead.

    • Because you’re invested. You’re a Scott Adams fan.

      As someone who likes the Harry Potter series, I hear you. It’s tough to see your idols fall into being dumbasses.

      If you sincerely think Scott Adams had zero bias, that he’s not a bigot, that he didn’t support “stop the steal,” that’s on your conscience and your value system. I choose to believe the impulse of what he said, not the 30 minutes of damage control afterward.

      I’d say nobody asked the guy his opinions on such subjects and just wanted to read his funny office comics.

      But that’s what happens with celebrities like this.

      11 replies →

  • > Most non-racists don’t need to spend 30 minutes on cable news explaining themselves to save face.

    That's the sort of thing an Catholic inquisitor would say. Denial proves guilt!

    • Not really a great analogy but okay.

      It’s not like Scott Adams did nothing wrong and was pulled in front of an inquisitor. He said weird shit and then had to play a game of PR damage control.

      3 replies →