← Back to context

Comment by King-Aaron

16 hours ago

If the Lake Michigan thing is just in the first 1%, then whatever's in the other 99% is going to be absolutely disgusting.

I searched it with the tool but nothing came up about Lake Michigan. What happened?

  • https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA000250...

    "He participated regularly in paying money to force me to ___ with him and he was present when my uncle murdered my newborn child and disposed of the body in Lake Michigan. "

    The uncle is allegedly referring to Trump

    • https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2025/12/27/a.... This mentions the Trump angle. It also mentions that the report came out before the 2020 election and could be fake. I'm a little confused because the report itself says nothing about Trump so don't know where the Free press gets that and they don't tell you what the source is or I missed it.

      Edit: Oh I get it. The woman's statement Donald Trump is named as one of the witnesses. She says that he watched the murder. He wasn't the uncle. He is listed as a witness to the murder. This is highly highly suspect in my opinion. Seems very sensationalistic and no reason given it as to why Trump was there. His name is just thrown in.

      1 reply →

I would expect a large portion of the remaining records to be internal emails about memos about the process of building a case around evidence, rather than the root evidence itself.

Not that that would excuse the administration's unlawful behavior so far, or indicate the unreleased 99% can't have some big bombshells.