← Back to context Comment by suddenlybananas 7 days ago Every time. 2 comments suddenlybananas Reply overfeed 7 days ago Another victory notch for the "AI Influentist" article[1].Step 1: thought leader reveals Shocking(tm) AI achievementStep 2: post gets tractionStep 3: additional context is revealed, dragging the original claim from the realm of the miraculous to "merely" useful.I don't think Mitchell intentionally misrepresented/exaggerated, but the phenomenon is reccuring. What's the logical explanation for the frequency?1. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46623195 dormento 7 days ago Getting tiresome, isn't it?
overfeed 7 days ago Another victory notch for the "AI Influentist" article[1].Step 1: thought leader reveals Shocking(tm) AI achievementStep 2: post gets tractionStep 3: additional context is revealed, dragging the original claim from the realm of the miraculous to "merely" useful.I don't think Mitchell intentionally misrepresented/exaggerated, but the phenomenon is reccuring. What's the logical explanation for the frequency?1. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46623195
Another victory notch for the "AI Influentist" article[1].
Step 1: thought leader reveals Shocking(tm) AI achievement
Step 2: post gets traction
Step 3: additional context is revealed, dragging the original claim from the realm of the miraculous to "merely" useful.
I don't think Mitchell intentionally misrepresented/exaggerated, but the phenomenon is reccuring. What's the logical explanation for the frequency?
1. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46623195
Getting tiresome, isn't it?