← Back to context Comment by fbelzile 1 month ago It can, and likely was, both. 3 comments fbelzile Reply adamiscool8 1 month ago It’s a good thing Canada waited for China to resolve all these issues before swinging open our market doors to them. wasabi991011 1 month ago When you have two overlapping issues, it is perfectly reasonable to choose to focus on the one you consider more important given the current context.If the context changes, it is reasonable to change which issue you focus on. lovich 1 month ago We threatened to annex them with the 51st state bullshit.If I was in Canadas position, I’d prefer trading with the guy with shitty practices over the guy actively threatening my sovereignty.I don’t get the indignation you’re expressing. Do you work with people in your personal life after they threaten your existence?
adamiscool8 1 month ago It’s a good thing Canada waited for China to resolve all these issues before swinging open our market doors to them. wasabi991011 1 month ago When you have two overlapping issues, it is perfectly reasonable to choose to focus on the one you consider more important given the current context.If the context changes, it is reasonable to change which issue you focus on. lovich 1 month ago We threatened to annex them with the 51st state bullshit.If I was in Canadas position, I’d prefer trading with the guy with shitty practices over the guy actively threatening my sovereignty.I don’t get the indignation you’re expressing. Do you work with people in your personal life after they threaten your existence?
wasabi991011 1 month ago When you have two overlapping issues, it is perfectly reasonable to choose to focus on the one you consider more important given the current context.If the context changes, it is reasonable to change which issue you focus on.
lovich 1 month ago We threatened to annex them with the 51st state bullshit.If I was in Canadas position, I’d prefer trading with the guy with shitty practices over the guy actively threatening my sovereignty.I don’t get the indignation you’re expressing. Do you work with people in your personal life after they threaten your existence?
It’s a good thing Canada waited for China to resolve all these issues before swinging open our market doors to them.
When you have two overlapping issues, it is perfectly reasonable to choose to focus on the one you consider more important given the current context.
If the context changes, it is reasonable to change which issue you focus on.
We threatened to annex them with the 51st state bullshit.
If I was in Canadas position, I’d prefer trading with the guy with shitty practices over the guy actively threatening my sovereignty.
I don’t get the indignation you’re expressing. Do you work with people in your personal life after they threaten your existence?