I've found the idea of unikernels interesting for several years now, is there a tl;dr on why they don't seem to have taken off, like at all? Or is it all happening behind some doors I don't have access to?
I think that part of it is that relatively few people use bare-metal servers these days, and nested virtualisation isn't universally supported. I also found this technical critique [0] compelling, but I have no idea if any of it is accurate or not.
This is really well written, thanks for sharing.
I didn't understand the point of using Unikraft though, if you can boot linux in much less than 150ms, with a far less exotic environment
Security, it isn't only memory footprint.
I've found the idea of unikernels interesting for several years now, is there a tl;dr on why they don't seem to have taken off, like at all? Or is it all happening behind some doors I don't have access to?
I think that part of it is that relatively few people use bare-metal servers these days, and nested virtualisation isn't universally supported. I also found this technical critique [0] compelling, but I have no idea if any of it is accurate or not.
[0]: https://www.tritondatacenter.com/blog/unikernels-are-unfit-f...
When I first heard about unikernels my hope/thought was that people would go back to using more bare-metal servers for unikernels.
They kind of did, that is basically how serverless works.
Managed runtimes on top of hypervisors.
[dead]