← Back to context

Comment by pityJuke

20 hours ago

I was caught off guard by how brutal this article was at points. I don't really follow Scott Alexander much, so I was pleasantly surprised by it. While I don't have the same relationship with Scott Adams... I can see parts of this in my relationship with Kanye.

[flagged]

  • Seems like he's just quoting Adams himself. Adams was popular for his self-deprecating humor.

    Adams used to tell people the secret to success was being in the top 25% at multiple things - he could draw and he could make corporate jokes, but he was not exceptional in either of those things. It's not really a pot shot, more of a tribute. He's still saying Adams was just below Leonardo da Vinci.

    • Less about the degree to which Adams was talented (which, as you note, Adams might agree), more about how much his books sucked and the ideas within them were ridiculous, arguing that Adams' claims regarding hypnosis were entirely bogus, and that gaining popularity as Scott Adams the blogger-slash-podcast host (as opposed to "Dilbert guy") "destroyed him."

  • For what it’s worth, I think a lot of people were pretty happy to shit on Scott Adams for the last decade.

    I don’t know anything about Scott Alexander, but even well before Adams had cancer, there was a thread on Something Awful making fun of all the stupid weird shit Adams would say.

    • That's fine - the man was certainly not above being criticized, and he had plenty of flaws. Point is, do it while he's alive, don't wait until he's dead (especially when his death was not a surprise)

      8 replies →

  • > Pretty easy to take pot shots at a dead guy who lacks the ability to punch back

    if you read the piece he touches on this

  • His response wouldn't have been anything beyond angry passive aggressive tweets.

    Source: have been on the receiving end of a Scott Adams rage