← Back to context Comment by tensility 11 hours ago So, should we assume that they vibe-coded this patch? Sad... 3 comments tensility Reply conception 11 hours ago They had plenty of bad patches before this. Microsoft products just aren’t great quality. aprilnya 10 hours ago It’s insane how many bad patches they’ve had recently though. I swear it didn’t used to happen this often tosti 6 hours ago Some 20 years ago they had patches for a buffer overflow vulnerability. The first patch made the buffer one byte longer. The next round of patches addressed a supposedly new vulnerability and the same buffer got another byte longer...
conception 11 hours ago They had plenty of bad patches before this. Microsoft products just aren’t great quality. aprilnya 10 hours ago It’s insane how many bad patches they’ve had recently though. I swear it didn’t used to happen this often tosti 6 hours ago Some 20 years ago they had patches for a buffer overflow vulnerability. The first patch made the buffer one byte longer. The next round of patches addressed a supposedly new vulnerability and the same buffer got another byte longer...
aprilnya 10 hours ago It’s insane how many bad patches they’ve had recently though. I swear it didn’t used to happen this often tosti 6 hours ago Some 20 years ago they had patches for a buffer overflow vulnerability. The first patch made the buffer one byte longer. The next round of patches addressed a supposedly new vulnerability and the same buffer got another byte longer...
tosti 6 hours ago Some 20 years ago they had patches for a buffer overflow vulnerability. The first patch made the buffer one byte longer. The next round of patches addressed a supposedly new vulnerability and the same buffer got another byte longer...
They had plenty of bad patches before this. Microsoft products just aren’t great quality.
It’s insane how many bad patches they’ve had recently though. I swear it didn’t used to happen this often
Some 20 years ago they had patches for a buffer overflow vulnerability. The first patch made the buffer one byte longer. The next round of patches addressed a supposedly new vulnerability and the same buffer got another byte longer...