← Back to context

Comment by doubled112

10 hours ago

Having two separate clipboard buffers is a feature I intentionally use.

Yup, both have their uses. If you use a clipboard manager or have the clipboard synchronized between devices/remote desktops/VMs, the primary selection comes in handy for stuff you don't exactly want saved to disk, crossing VM boundaries, or transmitted over the network. I use middle-click pasting primarily for its separate buffer.

https://xkcd.com/1172/

  • Except it's not a bug that found use. It's intentional behavior. From https://specifications.freedesktop.org/clipboard/latest/:

    > The rationale for this behavior is mostly that [having a unified clipboard] has a lot of problems, namely:

    > - inconsistent with Mac/Windows

    > - confusingly, selecting anything overwrites the clipboard

    > - not efficient with a tool such as xclipboard [(tool that maintains a history of specifically CLIPBOARD; it would be messy to keep a history of all selections)]

    > - you should be able to select text, then paste the clipboard over it, but that doesn’t work if the selection and clipboard are the same

    > - the Copy menu item is useless and does nothing, which is confusing

    > - if you think of PRIMARY as the current selection, Cut doesn’t make any sense since the selection simultaneously disappears and becomes the current selection

    • The selection buffer is easier to understand if thought about more simply. Middle click to “put my selection here”.

      The actual clipboard is a separate feature in my mind.