Comment by whispem
2 days ago
Thanks a lot for your comment!
I’ve put a lot of work into this over the past year—learning from established open source projects and carefully testing every feature to build something robust and reliable. For now, this is still a passion and learning project, but I do hope that, eventually, it can mature enough to be used in real-world production—maybe even in enterprise contexts someday.
There’s still a long way to go, and I’m definitely open to feedback and suggestions from anyone who’d like to help me improve.
main question is what % of code is yours and what % is generated by AI?
Good question!
All the code, architecture, logic, and design in minikv were written by me, 100% by hand. I did use AI tools only for a small part of the documentation—specifically the README, LEARNING.md, and RAM_COMMUNITY.md files—to help structure the content and improve clarity.
But for all the source code (Rust), tests, and implementation, I wrote everything myself, reviewing and designing every part.
Let me know if you want details or want to look at a specific part of the code!
Was CONTRIBUTING.md also authored with the help of AI tools?
I can see a "YOUR_USERNAME" placeholder was removed in this commit: https://github.com/whispem/minikv/commit/eda60aa154a1293d981....
https://github.com/whispem/minikv/blob/main/src/coordinator/...
Nice, you are the first person I have seen who cares to type in unicode arrow instead of "->" in comments.
6 replies →
You left behind a script clearly written by your LLM tool that patched some problems in your code. It's undeniable.
I'm all for using the tools available, but I don't understand lying about it.
https://github.com/whispem/minikv/blob/main/fix_ci_complete....
5 replies →
100% of the code is llm-generated, and so are 100% of his comments in this thread
Nope, it’s all me—both code and comments :) If you want to review something technical, I’m happy to chat!
3 replies →