← Back to context

Comment by jajuuka

2 hours ago

This is riddled with fearmongering. You don't need to be a cybersecurity expert to take interest in your own child. It doesn't take a PhD to enable parental controls or tell your child "no" if they want something that is inappropriate for them.

You might as well have said that you need to be a police officer to make sure your child isn't hit by a drunk driver, kidnapped by creeps or attacked by someone on the street. Children are under the care of parents or guardians for a reason. It's not to fist fight criminals or design their own security system.

Your analogy about drunk drivers actually makes my point: we don't just tell parents "be vigilant". We have DUI laws, road design standards, and enforcement--systemic solutions, not just individual responsibility.

With tech, we've largely abdicated that, placing the entire burden on parents to defend against industrial-scale manipulation.

Expecting individual parents to successfully counter industrial-scale behavioral engineering is a systems failure, not a parenting failure.