← Back to context

Comment by _aavaa_

14 hours ago

This doesn’t answer the actual question: why they wouldn’t just do both?

There are costs to doing ads (e.g. it burns social/political capital that could be used to defuse scandals or slow down hostile legislation, it consumes some fraction of your employees’ work hours, it may discourage some new talent from joining).

  • You have AGI, why do you care about new talent? You have AGI to do the ads. You have AGI to pick the best ads.

    Isn't that the pitch of AGI? Solve any problems?

    • Yes. Infinite low cost intelligence labor to replace those pesky humans!

      Really reminds me of the economics of slavery. Best way for line to go up is the ultimate suppression and subjugation of labor!

      Hypothetically can lead to society free to not waste their life on work, but pursue their passions. Most likely it’ll lead to plantation-style hungry-hungry-hippo ruling class taking the economy away from the rest of us