Comment by mmooss
13 hours ago
> A proof that Terence Tao and his colleagues have never heard of?
Tao et al. didn't know of the literature proof that started this subthread.
13 hours ago
> A proof that Terence Tao and his colleagues have never heard of?
Tao et al. didn't know of the literature proof that started this subthread.
there is an immense amount of stuff out there on ArXiv that no one has ever looked at
Right, but someone else did ("colleagues.")
No, they searched for it. There's a lot of math literature out there, not even an expert is going to know all of it.
Point being, it's not the same proof.
4 replies →